| Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources Evaluation Predicate ikp Best Two Years 2009 |
 |
 |
 |
| Wednesday, 24 March 2010 08:54 | |||||||
Page 1 of 2 JAKARTA. Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources was ranked second best in the evaluation of Government Accountability and Performance (ikp) Central Government Agencies Year 2009. Results are the assessment of State Ministry of Administrative Reform of the 72 central government agencies.
Based on the results of the Central Government Agencies ikp Year 2009. From 72 central government agencies are evaluated, seven agencies, including the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources have the predicate "B" (good), 29 institutions reached predicate "CC" (quite good), 33 institutions predicate "C" (slightly less) and achieved the 3 agencies "D" (or less). The seven agencies that the central government reached the predicate "B" ie, the Ministry of National Education, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Ministry of Finance, Board of Finance and Development Supervision, the Corruption Eradication Commission and the Ministry of Public Works. Minister of State for the PAN and Bureaucratic Reform, E.E. Mangindaan said, most central government agencies still need attention in the implementation of government management performance-based. "The level of performance accountability have not obtained satisfactory and still need improvement and repair," said Minister of State for the PAN and Bureaucratic Reform in the Evaluation Report Submission Performance Accountability Central Government in Jakarta, Tuesday (23 / 3). He warned, however, any results obtained from akuntabilltas evaluation of this performance, not a verdict is to be feared, but rather used as a trigger and drive to improve implementation-ikp system in their respective institutions. Government agencies to work in groups with a predicate value "B" (good), and RB Minister expects to be able to continue to maintain and improve its performance, so that achievements can serve as an example / best practices by other government agencies. Ikp periodic evaluations conducted, the aim is to see the extent of commitment of public sector management application based on performance in improving government performance accountability, provide suggestions for improvements to increase performance other than that evaluation is intended to provide appreciation and respect to the institutions working earnestly implement management performance-based government. In the evaluation, assessment of material carried by 5 (five) big component of performance management, which include: planning performance (weighting 35%), performance measurement (weighting 20%), performance reporting (weighting 15%), evaluation of performance (weight 10 %) and the last achievement of performance (weight 20%). [esdm] www.tenderoffer.biz
|
Legitimacy & Law
About Us
Trusted Partner
